The Problem
Surprise medical bills—also known as “balance billing”—have long been one of the most pressing affordability concerns facing American families. Historically, most states allowed doctors to bill patients for any balance remaining after their health insurance paid its share. These charges were particularly devastating when out-of-network providers—who had no contractual rate agreements with insurers—billed patients for the full cost of care.
Today, with the No Surprises Act in place, patients are protected from most surprise medical bills. But new challenges have emerged. Certain private equity–backed providers and profit-focused intermediaries are now exploiting the law’s arbitration process as a business model to maximize revenue.
Instead of serving as a last-resort mechanism for payment disputes, the independent dispute resolution (IDR) process has been flooded with claims. Millions of cases have been filed since the law’s passage—far exceeding government projections—many of which are ineligible or inflated. This surge has created costly bottlenecks, slowed down legitimate dispute resolution, and burdened both health plans and employers with unnecessary administrative fees.
What’s more, data show that providers are prevailing more frequently in arbitration, and when they win, their awards are often many times higher than typical in-network or Medicare rates. This not only drives up direct costs for health plans but also raises premiums and out-of-pocket expenses for American families. Meanwhile, IDR entities are not required to provide full explanations of their decisions, and the law lacks a clear appeals process—leaving limited accountability or oversight.

Latest News
Four Provider Organizations Are Abusing and Misusing Arbitration. Employers, Patients, and Families are Paying the Price
Prior to the passage of the No Surprises Act, certain private equity-backed health care providers designed an entire business model around strategically exiting health plans’ networks as a way to maximize out-of-network reimbursements at the expense of patients,...
ICYMI: How Private Equity Is Gaming the No Surprises Act
Researchers at Georgetown University’s Center on Health Insurance Reform recently analyzed new data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) detailing arbitration outcomes from all of 2023 under the No Surprises Act. While the law has been effective...
Four Key Takeaways from the Latest No Surprises Act Data
Researchers from the Brookings Institution recently analyzed the latest data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) detailing arbitration outcomes under the No Surprises Act (NSA). The analysis reviews Q3 and Q4 2024 outcomes as an update to their...